Top line accelerating.
+3.0% YoY versus +0.5% prior. 3y CAGR +0.6%.
+3.0%We use cookies
MainRatios uses cookies for essential site functions. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies including session replay sampling (PostHog, Google Analytics) and advertising cookies (Google AdSense). You can reject non-essential cookies, including the "sale" or sharing of personal information under CCPA, and you may withdraw consent at any time (GDPR). See our Privacy Policy for details.
Basic Materials · Market Cap: $242.2B
Fundamentals as of 2025-12-31
All analysis on this page is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Fair values are model-based estimates. Always do your own research.
The Question
Bottom line: LIN is rated BUY by the 1 legendary model, but earns a C sector grade (53/100) in Basic Materials. Use the per-tab analysis to form your own view. Drill into the valuation breakdown and sector ranking for the full picture.
Yes — Linde plc's 18.0% ROE ranks above the S&P 500 median, and D/E 1.23 stays within healthy bounds.
Financial story
Yes — Linde plc's 18.0% ROE shows strong capital efficiency, and its 1.23 debt-to-equity stays within healthy bounds.
LIN trades at 34.4x earnings. Sector context and per-investor signals are in the valuation tab.
LIN and BHP differ on P/E, ROE, and revenue growth. See the full LIN vs BHP compare matrix.
Buffett evaluates LIN against his respective frameworks. Per-model fair value and reasoning are in the valuation tab.
LIN's P/E ratio is 34.4x. 5-year P/E history is in the financials tab.
Investor verdicts vary by methodology. Full breakdown by investor and signal is in the valuation tab.
LIN's earnings calendar and history are tracked in the financials tab. Specific dates depend on company-published guidance.
+3.0% YoY versus +0.5% prior. 3y CAGR +0.6%.
+3.0%Net margin 20.3% versus 19.9% prior (+0.4pp). Operating 26.3%.
20.3%P/E 33.7x — 1% below the 5y median of 34.2x. Forward 28.6x hints at EPS expansion next year.
33.7xHow does LIN compare?
See exactly where LIN ranks
Sign in to unlock the full sector ranking — free.
Sign in to see the rankingLIN sits at #15 in Basic Materials with a C grade (53/100).
Structural-shift event, not a quarterly print. The marginal-dollar analysis: $650B incremental 2026 hyperscaler capex MUST land somewhere in the semiconductor supply chain — semis don't produce demand exogenously, they are derivative-demand from compute spend. WSTS projects industry revenue at ~$975B (+26% YoY), Bank of America's Vivek Arya models closer to 30%, which would cross the $1T threshold for the first time in history. Both estimates are anchored on SEC-filed capex commitments, not analyst speculation.
The smoking gun is the pace of upward revision — among the fastest in semiconductor-cycle history. Consensus 2026 hyperscaler capex moved from ~$465B at the start of Q3 2025 earnings season to ~$527B by the end of the calls, then pushed toward $650B within weeks. Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta account for roughly 80% of incremental dollar flow. What makes 2026 different is composition: the marginal dollar is shifting from pure merchant GPUs toward custom silicon (Google TPU, Meta MTIA), high-bandwidth memory (HBM3E sold out through 2026), and advanced packaging capacity. This composition shift rewires who captures the margin.
Forward implication: the picks-and-shovels trade has rotated one tier downstream from accelerators to memory and wafer-fab equipment. Memory is the sleeper trade — HBM3E pricing power has returned to the memory oligopoly for the first time since 2018 cycle peak, with MU contract pricing locked in well in advance. The equipment trio (AMAT, LRCX, KLAC) sits at ~28x forward earnings with backlogs extending into 2027 and less single-customer concentration than accelerator vendors. Power is now the binding constraint, not chip supply — interconnection queue times in several US grid regions exceed four years, and transformer lead times have blown out from months to years. This makes LIN (industrial gas), nuclear utilities, and grid infrastructure unconventional AI trades.
Counter-narrative: the Chanos circular-revenue critique — OpenAI raises money, spends it on MSFT Azure compute, MSFT justifies larger NVDA orders, NVDA invests back into OpenAI — resembles late-1990s telecom vendor financing. The counter: today's hyperscalers collectively produce hundreds of billions in operating cash flow annually; they can fund capex out of internally generated cash without stretching the balance sheet. The real Q2-Q3 risk is forward, not backward: the first hyperscaler to cut 2027 capex growth guidance by even 10% on a call would reprice the entire semiconductor complex overnight. That's the scenario every long-only semi fund manager is quietly stress-testing — but it hasn't happened, and the Q1 + confirmed 2026 capex commitments captured by this news event remain unambiguously bullish.