Top line accelerating.
+8.4% YoY versus +6.0% prior. 3y CAGR +10.6%.
+8.4%We use cookies
MainRatios uses cookies for essential site functions. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies including session replay sampling (PostHog, Google Analytics) and advertising cookies (Google AdSense). You can reject non-essential cookies, including the "sale" or sharing of personal information under CCPA, and you may withdraw consent at any time (GDPR). See our Privacy Policy for details.
Technology · Market Cap: $529.6B
Live price unavailable
Fundamentals as of 2025-05-31
All analysis on this page is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Fair values are model-based estimates. Always do your own research.
Bottom line: ORCL is rated BUY by the 1 legendary model, but earns a D sector grade (44/100) in Technology. Use the per-tab analysis to form your own view. Drill into the valuation breakdown and sector ranking for the full picture.
The Question
P/E 38.4x — 17% above the 5y median of 32.9x. Forward 28.5x hints at EPS expansion next year.
38.4xMixed — Oracle Corporation has 60.8% ROE but D/E 7.21.
Financial story
Mixed — Oracle Corporation's 60.8% ROE is strong, but its 7.21 debt-to-equity is elevated.
Because its cloud backlog exploded. In September 2025 Oracle disclosed that remaining performance obligations had jumped to $455 billion and projected $144 billion of fiscal-2030 cloud revenue; the stock rose 36% in one session, its best day since 1992. By the end of fiscal 2026 that backlog reached $638 billion, up 363% year over year, and OCI revenue grew 93% to $5.8 billion in the May quarter. The market stopped pricing Oracle as a slow database vendor and started pricing it as the fourth hyperscaler — even after the shares gave back nearly half their peak to about $184.
RPO — remaining performance obligations — is contracted cloud work Oracle has booked but not yet delivered, and at $638 billion it is close to nine times the company's $67.4 billion of annual revenue. It matters because the stock now trades on it: management expects to recognize roughly 12% of the backlog as revenue over the next twelve months, so it is a visible base for the fiscal-2027 guide of about $90 billion. The caution is that a backlog is a forecast with a contract attached, not cash — and Bank of America estimates more than half of it traces to a single customer, OpenAI.
Yes — free cash flow was about negative $23.7 billion in fiscal 2026. Oracle generated a record $32 billion of operating cash flow but spent $55.7 billion on capital expenditures, up 162%, to build the AI cloud. Management guides to roughly $70 billion of net capex in fiscal 2027 and says it expects to raise about $40 billion more in debt and equity, including a $20 billion share program, on top of $43 billion of debt raised last year. Unlike the established hyperscalers, Oracle funds the build-out largely with external capital rather than its own cash flow.
By Bank of America's estimate, more than half of Oracle's $638 billion backlog traces to a single customer, OpenAI. That concentration runs largely through the roughly $300 billion Stargate capacity commitment, and it cuts both ways: it is the engine behind the RPO surge but also leaves Oracle unusually exposed to one counterparty. A report that OpenAI had missed internal targets sent the shares lower, and DA Davidson cut its price target to $200 in late 2025 citing the single-customer driver of the backlog — though it raised the target to $225 after the June 2026 results.
They span an unusually wide range around a price near $184. The consensus twelve-month target sits around $253 across roughly 43 analysts, but the panel runs from a low near $155 to a high of $400 at Guggenheim. After the June 2026 results, targets moved both ways — Bernstein raised to $325 and Barclays to $250, while Wedbush cut to $240 and Scotiabank to $241 on the capital-raise and cash-flow concerns. That roughly two-and-a-half-fold spread captures the core disagreement about how to value a record backlog.
Because a one-time gain flattered the earnings underneath it. The trailing GAAP multiple near 32 times rests on per-share earnings that include a $2.7 billion pre-tax gain from selling Oracle's Ampere stake, booked in the quarter ended November 2025, which lifted that period's earnings to $2.10 a share. Strip out the gain and trailing profit — and the multiple — look richer, not cheaper. The forward multiple, around 23 times the fiscal-2027 non-GAAP guide of about $8.05, is the cleaner read, but it still capitalizes a backlog that has not yet reached the income statement.



| Firm | Target | Rating | Recent move | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
GU Guggenheim John DiFucci | $400 | Buy | reiterated; Street-high | Jun 11 |
BE Bernstein Mark Moerdler | $325 | Outperform | raised 319→325 after Q4 FY26 | Jun 11 |
Mizuho |
| $320 |
| Outperform |
| reiterated post-Q4 |
| Jun 15 |
![]() TD Cowen Derrick Wood | $300 | Buy | raised 250→300 | Jun 9 |
CF Cantor Fitzgerald Thomas Blakey | $284 | Overweight | reiterated; raised 229→284 on Jun 5 | Jun 11 |
![]() Barclays Raimo Lenschow | $250 | Overweight | raised 240→250 | Jun 11 |
SC Scotiabank Patrick Colville | $241 | Sector Outperform | lowered 290→241 on the selloff | Jun 11 |
WE Wedbush Daniel Ives | $240 | Outperform | lowered 275→240 on capital-raise concerns | Jun 11 |
![]() Bank of America Brad Sills | $240 | Buy | raised 200→240 | Jun 9 |
PS Piper Sandler Billy Fitzsimmons | $225 | Overweight | raised 210→225 | Jun 11 |
DD DA Davidson Gil Luria | $225 | Buy | raised 200→225 | Jun 11 |
BM BMO Capital Markets Keith Bachman | $220 | Outperform | raised 200→220 | Jun 11 |
SC Stephens & Co. | $164 | Equal Weight | cautious on capex/cash flow; near the Street-low | Jun 11 |
Strength. $638 billion of cloud work is already booked — up 363% in a year and close to nine times annual revenue — the backlog that turned a legacy database vendor into the surprise fourth hyperscaler. What the price leaves unresolved is how much of that demand, leaning on a single OpenAI contract, converts into cash before the build-out is paid for.
Risk. Negative $23.7 billion: that was free cash flow in fiscal 2026, even against a record $32 billion of operating cash flow, because capex more than doubled to $55.7 billion to build the AI cloud. What the price may not fully discount is the bill — tens of billions in new debt and equity, cloud margins near 16%, and a backlog that rests on one customer.
How does ORCL compare?
See exactly where ORCL ranks
Sign in to unlock the full sector ranking — free.
Sign in to see the rankingORCL sits at #120 in Technology with a D grade (44/100).
The market is repricing backlog quality, not backlog size. Oracle's headline numbers were strong — total cloud revenue around $9.9 billion (up roughly 47%), OCI up about 93%, and a remaining-performance-obligation balance near $638 billion — yet the stock fell roughly 10% the day after the print. That gap between fundamentals and price action is the whole story.
The smoking-gun datapoint: of that ~$638 billion backlog, roughly $300 billion (about 47%) is reportedly tied to a single counterparty, OpenAI, largely through the Stargate buildout. A backlog that concentrated is worth a lower multiple than a diversified one, because the variance of outcomes is wider — one renegotiation, funding gap, or timeline slip moves a disproportionate share of future revenue.
Forward read (1-4 quarters): the bull/bear debate now centers on cash conversion. Oracle spent roughly $55.7 billion in fiscal 2026 and guided to about $70 billion in fiscal 2027. That capex is front-loaded ahead of the revenue it supports, compressing near-term free cash flow and lifting leverage — so even with revenue growth accelerating, the equity can de-rate as investors demand a higher risk premium on the OpenAI exposure.
Counter-narrative: bulls argue the concentration is a feature, not a bug — a multi-year, contractually committed anchor tenant that underwrites the capex and would be hard for any rival cloud to replicate. If OpenAI's compute demand holds, the backlog converts and today's multiple looks cheap in hindsight. The risk is closer to binary, which is exactly why the multiple, not the growth rate, is doing the moving.