Top line decelerating.
+11.5% YoY versus +16.8% prior. 3y CAGR +22.5%.
+11.5%We use cookies
MainRatios uses cookies for essential site functions. With your consent, we also use analytics cookies including session replay sampling (PostHog, Google Analytics) and advertising cookies (Google AdSense). You can reject non-essential cookies, including the "sale" or sharing of personal information under CCPA, and you may withdraw consent at any time (GDPR). See our Privacy Policy for details.
Financial Services · Market Cap: $337.6B
Fundamentals as of 2026-03-31
All analysis on this page is for educational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Fair values are model-based estimates. Always do your own research.
P/E 19.3x — 18% above the 5y median of 16.3x.
Mixed — Morgan Stanley has 15.9% ROE but D/E 12.83.
Financial story
Mixed — Morgan Stanley's 15.9% ROE is strong, but its 12.83 debt-to-equity is elevated.
Bottom line: MS is flagged as overvalued by the 1 legendary model, but earns a C sector grade (50/100) in Financial Services. Use the per-tab analysis to form your own view. Drill into the valuation breakdown and sector ranking for the full picture.
How does MS compare?
The Question
Lynch evaluates MS against his respective frameworks. Per-model fair value and reasoning are in the valuation tab.
MS's P/E ratio is 17.6x. 5-year P/E history is in the financials tab.
Investor verdicts vary by methodology. Full breakdown by investor and signal is in the valuation tab.
MS's earnings calendar and history are tracked in the financials tab. Specific dates depend on company-published guidance.
MS is in the Financial Services sector. Sector ranking and peer comparison are in the sector tab.
0 of 6 legendary investor models rate MS a BUY. Fair value estimates and full investor breakdown are in the valuation tab.
See exactly where MS ranks
Sign in to unlock the full sector ranking — free.
Sign in to see the rankingMS sits at #80 in Financial Services with a C grade (50/100).
Universal-bank tape-setter quarter with cross-sector confirmation. When 5 of 5 major US banks beat consensus on both revenue and EPS in the same week — JPM (+13% YoY profit), MS ($3.43 vs $3.00 EPS), BLK (AUM milestone), WFC (cost discipline), C (services + markets) — the sector base rates lift mechanically. This isn't a JPM-centric story; it's a banking-system-wide tone reset.
The smoking gun is JPM's combination of +13% profit growth AND raised NII guidance. NII is a recurring stream, not one-time, so guide-raise signals durable forward visibility. Morgan Stanley's $3.43 EPS vs $3.00 consensus = ~14% beat with trading AND wealth both contributing reads directly to Goldman Sachs expectations — the broker-dealer setup just ratcheted higher. BlackRock crossed an eye-catching AUM threshold, though the more important number is net long-term flows in the high-single-digit-billions range, confirming iShares bond ETF capture of active-management share.
Forward implication: capital-markets activity is carrying the quarter while traditional lending cools — this is the composition shift bulls have been waiting for. Net interest margins are peaking with rate cuts priced into the curve, so banks with strong capital-markets franchises (JPM, MS) outperform pure-lender peers (regional banks) in 2026. Trading revenue is cyclical, so one quarter doesn't make a trend, but the read-through to GS and Schwab suggests Q1 was structurally strong, not a one-off.
Counter-narrative: three risks the beats hide. First, credit card net charge-offs at JPM, WFC, and C are drifting higher — management calls this 'normalization toward the upper end of the historical range' but the trend has not yet inflected. Second, NIM tailwind from 2025 fades through 2026. Third, Dimon's explicit 'increasingly complex risks' language — bank CEOs almost never say this when things are boring. Bears argue we're looking at the last clean quarter, with bank stocks near fair value (12-14x forward earnings) on peak-cycle numbers. The counter-to-counter: these are the best-capitalized US banks in a generation, CCAR-tested against double-digit unemployment scenarios. The question is not survival; it's whether the Q1 beat is already baked into 2026 consensus.